Legal Opinion

State v. Turgeon

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 16, 1993No. 92-445PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant contends his right to due process was violated when the intent of his plea bargain with the State was not fulfilled. Defendant entered into plea agreements with state and federal authorities, hoping to serve concurrent state and federal sentences. Defendant was first sentenced by the state court. Defendant was then sentenced by the federal court, which ordered that two sentences of 120 months should be served consecutively, but not to begin until after defendant completed 120 months of his state sentence, or upon release from state custody, whichever occurred first. The federal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BelanusSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  2. State v. DaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Antonio-AntimoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. State v. TurgeonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  3. State v. MarkuSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  4. State v. CurrierSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API