Legal Opinion

Wolpe v. Poretsky

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 3, 1946No. 8952PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court setting aside, as arbitrary and unreasonable, an order of the Zoning Commission of the District of Columbia. The Commission’s order singled out lot 70/100 for special or “spot” zoning. It prevented appellee Poretsky, the owner of the lot, from building an apartment house. He brought this suit against the Commission and recovered judgment. But the Commission has not appealed. The appellants are owners of various houses and lots in the general vicinity of lot 70/100 who have been permitted to intervene. Wolpe v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wolpe v. PoretskyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Board of Appeals of Hanover v. Housing Appeals Comm.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Lewis v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  3. Harry Shenk v. The Zoning Commission of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  4. American University v. PrentissDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1953
  5. Lowe v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API