Lowe v. City of Missoula
Montana Supreme Court
1Concurrence
ME. JUSTICE HASWELL,
(specially concurring):
I concur in the result reached by the majority, but I cannot endorse their statement of the applicable law. I would reverse, not on the ground that the city council and the district court made a mistake of fact, but because the rezoning ordinance constitutes prohibited and discriminatory “spot zoning”.
Eezoning by a city council is a legislative act. Bishop v. Town of Houghton, 69 Wash.2d 786, 420 P.2d 368; 1 Anderson, American Law of Zoning, § 4.28. The courts will not interfere unless the rezoning ordinance violates the enabling statutes or the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kissinger v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Freeman v. Board of AdjustmentMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- Bishop v. Town of HoughtonWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Fulmer v. Board of Railroad CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. StarkMontana Supreme Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.