Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lowe v. City of Missoula

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1974No. 12612Published

1Concurrence

ME. JUSTICE HASWELL,

(specially concurring):

I concur in the result reached by the majority, but I cannot endorse their statement of the applicable law. I would reverse, not on the ground that the city council and the district court made a mistake of fact, but because the rezoning ordinance constitutes prohibited and discriminatory “spot zoning”.

Eezoning by a city council is a legislative act. Bishop v. Town of Houghton, 69 Wash.2d 786, 420 P.2d 368; 1 Anderson, American Law of Zoning, § 4.28. The courts will not interfere unless the rezoning ordinance violates the enabling statutes or the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kissinger v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Freeman v. Board of AdjustmentMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Bishop v. Town of HoughtonWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Fulmer v. Board of Railroad CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State v. StarkMontana Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API