Legal Opinion

American Transmissions, Inc v. Attorney General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1997No. Docket 106104PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs sued the Attorney General for defamation, but the circuit court granted summary disposition on the ground that he is immune from tort liability when acting within the scope of his executive authority. The Court of Appeals reversed. We agree that the Attorney General is immune from this suit, and we therefore reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the judgment of the Court of Claims.

i

In the mid-1980s, the Attorney General conducted a “sting” operation to determine whether some independent transmission shops were doing unnecessary work. 1 In part, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Smith v. Department of Public HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Marrocco v. RandlettMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Gracey v. Wayne County ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Debano-Griffin v. Lake CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Tarlea v. CrabtreeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Armstrong v. Ypsilanti Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. EBI-Detroit, Inc. v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Maiberger v. City of LivoniaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API