Legal Opinion

Brackenridge v. Dawson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1856PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGookins, J.

This was a bill in chancery filed by Dawson, the purchaser, to obtain a rescission of a contract for the purchase of real estate.

Previous to 1836, one Alexander Ewing was the owner of a tract of land adjoining the town of Fort-Wayne, of which he died seized, leaving several heirs, who, in that year, proceeded to have partition made of the tract by *384a suit in chancery in the Allen Circuit Court, in which gome of the heirs 'were complainants, and others, of whom some were infants, were defendants. The commissioners appointed to make partition reported that the tract was no£ susceptible of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hepburn & Dundas v. AuldSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  2. Jackson v. AshtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  3. Duncan v. JeterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
  4. Doe ex dem. Martin v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boyd v. RoaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  2. Boggess v. HowardTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  3. McCreery v. FallisIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Sloane v. MartinNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Bacher v. City National Bank, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API