Boggess v. Howard
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Rusk. Tried below before the Hon. J. B. Williamson. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of Justice Moore.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
The writ of error in this .case must be dismissed for want of a proper bond. The bond is not in conformity with the statute. (Art. 1517, Pas. Dig.) The case of Waterhouse v. Love, 23 Texas, 560, and numerous subsequent cases, decide the question.
Dismissed.
Opinion rendered March 10, 1873.
The case was reinstated, and, plaintiff in error allowed until next term to file a new bond, which term began on December 3, 1873.
Moore, Associate Justice. — This is an action of trespass to try title, brought by the appellant, Boggess, against the appellee Howard, to which appellee Ray, the landlord of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ayres v. DupreyTexas Supreme Court · 1864
- Woodcock v. BennetNew York Supreme Court · 1823
- Warder v. TainterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
- Hawley v. BullockTexas Supreme Court · 1867
- Pollard v. CockeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Harrison v. OrrTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Baker v. ComptonTexas Supreme Court · 1879
- Smith v. PerkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Laughter v. SeelaTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Taylor v. DoomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.