Legal Opinion
Wyne v. Medo Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 12, 2004No. CIV. RDB-02-1812PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BENNETT, District Judge.
On March 25, 2004, this Court issued an Order and Judgment granting Defendant Medo Industries, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment on the grounds that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. Now pending is Defendant’s Bill of Costs, which was filed pursuant to Local Rule 109.1 (D.Md.2001) and Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs pro se Robert M. Wyne and Nicholas W. Lewis (collectively “Plaintiffs”) timely filed their opposition to Defendant’s application for costs. The issues have been fully briefed…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- White & White, Inc., Bluefield Supply Co., Crocker-Fels Co., and Ransdell Surgical, Inc. v. American Hospital Supply Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Flint v. HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Advance Business Systems and Supply Company v. Scm Corporation, Advance Business Systems and Supply Company v. Scm CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Broccoli v. Echostar Communications Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Rodriguez v. Marble Care Int'l., Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
- Qayumi v. Duke Univ.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2018
- Danika Yampierre v. Baltimore Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026
- Dauda v. JeanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.