Legal Opinion

Danika Yampierre v. Baltimore Police Department

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 13, 2026No. 1:21-cv-01209Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND DANIKA YAMPIERRE, * Plaintiff, * v. * Civil Case No. 1:21-cv-01209-JMC BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT * Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Presently before the court is Plaintiff Danika Yampierre’s Objection1 to the Bill of Costs (ECF No. 135). Defendant Baltimore Police Department (“BPD”) has not filed any response thereto. No hearing is necessary. Based on the reasons set forth immediately below, the Court is unpersuaded to adjust the Costs award, and Plaintiff’s Objection is OVERRULED. I. BACKGROUND On…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. White & White, Inc., Bluefield Supply Co., Crocker-Fels Co., and Ransdell Surgical, Inc. v. American Hospital Supply Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  3. Teague v. BakkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  4. Nancy C. Cherry v. Champion International Corporation, Equal Employment Advisory Council, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  5. Congregation of the Passion, Holy Cross Province v. Touche, Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API