Cheney v. Studstrup
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
SAM, Chief Judge.
Before the court are: (1) plaintiff Wayne Cheney’s objection to the removal of this case from state court by defendants J.N. Studstrup, J.N. Sisneros, Jeffrey Smith, and Salt Lake County and request for remand; (2) defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs state constitutional and negligence claims; and (3) plaintiffs motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. The court, having reviewed the memoranda submitted by the parties, will rule on the motions without the assistance of oral argument, pursuant to DUCivR 7—1(f).
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff alleges…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Williams v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Jacobs, Visconsi & Jacobs, Co. v. City of LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Pedro Leonardo Mascheroni v. Board of Regents of the University of California, University of California, Los Alamos National LaboratoryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wagner v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- Wagner v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2005