Davis v. . Leopold
New York Court of Appeals
Tuts action was brought by plaintiffs, as judgment creditors of the defendant Louis Leopold, to set aside conveyances by him to defendant Schneider, and by the latter- to defendant Katharine, the wife of Leopold; also a mortgage executed by her to defendant Whittle, on the ground that they were fraudulent and void as to creditors. The referee found the fraudulent intent alleged, and that the wife participated therein.
Read the full summary
Tuts action was brought by plaintiffs, as judgment creditors of the defendant Louis Leopold, to set aside conveyances by him to defendant Schneider, and by the latter- to defendant Katharine, the wife of Leopold; also a mortgage executed by her to defendant Whittle, on the ground that they were fraudulent and void as to creditors. The referee found the fraudulent intent alleged, and that the wife participated therein. The judgment entered upon his report was reversed by the General Term; the order did not state that it was upon questions of fact.- The following, which is the body of the…
1Opinion of the Court
Danforth, J.,
reads for reversal of order of General Term,
and for affirmance of judgment entered on report of referee.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by42 opinions
- Loos v. . WilkinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Koehler v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Shotwell v. . DixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Morton & Bliss v. New Orleans & Selma Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- National Harrow Co. v. E. Bement & SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.