Mather v. Simonton
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Elkhart Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Bicknell, C.
— This was a suit to compel specific performance of a contract. The complaint alleges that the appellant and appellee and five others severally owned lands in the corporate limits of the town of Elkhart, and, in 1866, ■-each, for himself and his assigns, agreed, in writing, with *596the others and their assigns, to lay out and annex to the-town of Elkhart an addition embracing said lands, in accordance with a plat annexed to said writing, and that certain, named streets of said town should be extended over said lands and opened immediately; that certain other named streets should be…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chamberlain v. BlueIndiana Supreme Court · 1843
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rust v. ConradMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Harter v. MorrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
- Brown v. ShelbyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Wilhite v. SkeltonCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1904