Legal Opinion

Mather v. Simonton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 8164PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C.

— This was a suit to compel specific performance of a contract. The complaint alleges that the appellant and appellee and five others severally owned lands in the corporate limits of the town of Elkhart, and, in 1866, ■-each, for himself and his assigns, agreed, in writing, with *596the others and their assigns, to lay out and annex to the-town of Elkhart an addition embracing said lands, in accordance with a plat annexed to said writing, and that certain, named streets of said town should be extended over said lands and opened immediately; that certain other named streets should be…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chamberlain v. BlueIndiana Supreme Court · 1843

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rust v. ConradMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Harter v. MorrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Brown v. ShelbyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Wilhite v. SkeltonCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API