Legal Opinion

Shelley v. Eccles

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 29, 1922No. 5645PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCotteral, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The fundamental rules on the subject of damages resulting from a breach of contract are, of course, not in doubt, and do not call for repetition. As frequently occurs, a chief source of controversy lies in their application to a given case, and particularly where a recovery is sought for the loss of anticipated profits. That they may be recovered, although not by general rule, under due circumstances, is settled. 8 R. C. L. p. 501; 17 C. J. p. 785; 1 Sedgwick Damages, § 149; Sutherland, Damages, § 59; Blagen v. Thompson et al., 23 Or. 239, 31 Pac. 647, 18…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Blagen v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. ECKINGTON AND SOLDIERS' HOME RAILWAY CO. v. McDEVITTSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Stebbins v. SeligCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Curtis Bros.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
  3. Branhill Realty Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API