Shelley v. Eccles
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtCotteral, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The fundamental rules on the subject of damages resulting from a breach of contract are, of course, not in doubt, and do not call for repetition. As frequently occurs, a chief source of controversy lies in their application to a given case, and particularly where a recovery is sought for the loss of anticipated profits. That they may be recovered, although not by general rule, under due circumstances, is settled. 8 R. C. L. p. 501; 17 C. J. p. 785; 1 Sedgwick Damages, § 149; Sutherland, Damages, § 59; Blagen v. Thompson et al., 23 Or. 239, 31 Pac. 647, 18…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Blagen v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- ECKINGTON AND SOLDIERS' HOME RAILWAY CO. v. McDEVITTSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Stebbins v. SeligCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gordon v. Curtis Bros.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- Branhill Realty Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932