Legal Opinion
Fox v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided March 14, 1994No. Civ. A. 2:94-0060PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending is the Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. Plaintiff, however, failed to file supporting memoranda as required by Rule 2.03 of the Local Rules of Practice and Procedure. 1 The Defendant responded citing not only Plaintiffs failure to comply with Rule 2.03, but also explaining why Plaintiff’s motion fails on the merits. Because Defendant addressed the merits of Plaintiff’s motion, this Court has attempted to do the same, albeit with the benefit of a very limited record.
Plaintiff commenced this action in the Circuit Court of Kanawha County on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mech. Contractors Ass'n of N. Cal. v. Greater Bay Area Ass'n of Plumbing & Mech. ContractorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Rasmussen v. American National Red CrossDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1994
- Arnold v. CSX Hotels, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2002
- McCale v. Union Labor Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
- Fox v. General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.