Village of Bloomingdale v. C.D.G. Enterprises, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Inglis
Plaintiff, the Village of Bloomingdale (Village), sued defendant, C.D.G. Enterprises, Inc., for breach of contract, alleging that defendant had not paid for services the Village provided in reviewing defendant’s application for rezoning and site plan approval. Defendant answered and filed a counterclaim alleging tortious interference with business expectancy and for recovery under a quasi-contract theory. The gist of defendant’s counterclaim was that the Village corruptly misused its governmental powers to prevent defendant’s plans from going forward and appropriated the benefits of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Barnett v. Zion Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Henrich v. Libertyville High SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
- Harinek v. 161 North Clark Street Ltd. PartnershipIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Village of Bloomingdale v. CDG Enterprises, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Village of Bloomingdale v. CDG Enterprises, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Village of Bloomingdale v. CDG Enterprises, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001