Legal Opinion

United States v. Musto

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 3, 1982No. 81-144PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAROKIN, District Judge.

Defendants, alleging irregularities in the selection process for grand and petit jurors and for grand jury forepersons and deputy forepersons, seek to have the indictment against them dismissed. All of the defendants are white males over the age of 35. They make two contentions: first, that Blacks and Hispanics have been historically underrepresented in the grand and petit jury arrays of this district, and second, that Blacks, women, and persons under the age of 28 have been underrepresented in the positions of grand jury foreperson and deputy foreperson. Defendants…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Thomas C. Ramseur v. Howard C. Beyer, Superintendent, New Jersey State Prison, Robert Del Tufo, New Jersey Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. State v. WorkmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  5. United States v. AimoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API