Legal Opinion
Ellensburg Cement Products, Inc. v. Kittitas County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 2014No. 88165-1PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gordon McCloud
¶1 Homer L. Gibson applied to Kittitas County for a conditional use permit (CUP) that *740would allow him to conduct rock crushing and other gravel and cement production related activities on his agricultural-zoned property. Kittitas issued a determination of nonsignificance (DNS) under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, and gave notice that it would hold a public hearing on the CUP. Ellensburg Cement Products Inc. objected to the CUP application and appealed Kittitas’s SEPA DNS under the county’s administrative appeal procedures. In the hearing that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Pasco v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Seattle City Light, Respondent, v. Aaron Swanson, AppellantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Potala Village Kirkland, LLC v. City of KirklandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Wa State Department Of Transporation, Res. v. City Of Seattle, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Fuller Style, Inc. And Steady Floats, Inc., Apps. v. City Of Seattle, Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Brown v. Mason CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.