Legal Opinion

Burkart v. Burkart

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 4, 2010No. 10AP-314PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Klatt, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, James I. Burkart, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations, that modified the amount of monthly spousal support that he owes to plaintiffappellee, Gail P. Burkart. Gail cross-appeals from the same judgment, and she also appeals the judgment denying her March 9, 2009 motion to compel. Because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to decide James’s motion for modification, we vacate the judgment granting that motion. We reverse the judgment denying Gail’s motion to compel.

{¶ 2} The trial court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Pratts v. HurleyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Larry Laughlin v. Kmart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. State ex rel. V Companies v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hulbert v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Lupo v. ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Catudal v. Netcare Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Risch v. SamuelOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. CunninghamOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API