Sanford v. Rowley
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Eaton. (Hooker, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
This is an action of libel. The libelous language complained of was as follows:
i(We know, of course, that Sanford himself would not hesitate to lie in court, or anywhere else, in order to defend himself against the truthful charges of treachery which the Journal has preferred against him. In bold, willful, skillful, and systematic prevarication he has probably never had an equal in the State of Michigan.”
The. innuendoes stated that by this language it was meant “ that the defendant had positive knowledge that the plaintiff was a reckless and confirmed criminal at heart, who would not only…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bourreseau v. Detroit Evening Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by6 opinions
- Post Pub. Co. v. HallamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
- Westropp v. E. W. Scripps Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- Newby v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Salem News Pub. Co. v. CaligaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906
- Jim Causley Pontiac Inc. v. World Wide Auto Leasing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.