United States v. Solnick
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Senior Judge:
This case raises the question whether an officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction can lawfully take the post-trial action under Article 60(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 860(c) (Supp. 1990), and Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 1107(a) when the subordinate officer who actually convened this court-martial, through some administrative oversight, never received the record of trial but was at all relevant times apparently ready, willing, and able to act on the case.
Consistent with his pleas, the appellant was found guilty of twice being…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Weiss v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. HillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. BonoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. CraigUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. JetteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BrownNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
- United States v. BarryArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
- United States v. NewloveArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003