Legal Opinion

Richard A. Barker v. Paul Morris, Warden, California State Prison at Folsom

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 24, 1985No. 83-1749PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:

The case before us presents a question requiring the interpretation of the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The appeal is from a denial of habeas corpus relief in the district court, after California courts, rejecting direct and collateral attacks, affirmed Richard Barker’s convictions for murder in the first degree and for involuntary manslaughter. We conclude that admission at trial of sworn videotaped testimony by an eyewitness who died prior to trial did not violate the Confrontation Clause, because of the necessity for…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Stephen Christian, A/K/A Stephen Cline v. William RhodeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. Mark A. Hopkinson v. Duane Shillinger, and the Attorney General of the State of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Charles William McHan United States of America v. Charles William McHanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API