Legal Opinion

Erland Construction Co. v. Park Steel Corp.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 3, 1996No. 95-P-796PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Erland Construction Co., Inc. (Erland), a general contractor, is a third-party plaintiff that claims indemnity from Park Steel Corporation (Park Steel), a structural steel subcontractor, for liability incurred by Erland in connection with a construction job in Westborough. The controversy involves the application of G. L. c. 149, § 29C, as appearing in St. 1986, c. 557, § 135, and provisions of the subcontract between Erland and Park Steel. See Miley v. Johnson & Johnson Orthopaedics, Inc., ante 30 (1996), in which that statute and cases interpreting it are discussed. As in Johnson & Johnson,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robert Industries, Inc. v. SpenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Harnois v. QUANNAPOWITT DEVELOPMENT, INC.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  3. Callahan v. A. J. Welch Equipment Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  4. Collins v. Kiewit Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. Modern Continental/HealyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  2. Fisher v. M. Spinelli & Sons Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API