Legal Opinion

JLM Industries, Inc. v. Stolt-Nielsen SA

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 26, 2004No. Nos. 03-7683(L), 03-7913(CON)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POOLER, Circuit Judge.

BACKGROUND

The named plaintiffs in this putative class action (collectively referred to hereinafter as “JLM”), are affiliated corporations which, according to the amended complaint, are “in the business of shipping, buying, selling and trading chemicals in bulk. The chemicals in bulk are shipped via parcel tankers to and from ports in the United States and to and from international ports.”1 JLM undertakes these shipments by contracting with the owners of parcel tankers to lease space on board a tanker for a certain voyage. The four defendants in this action (collectively…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Goldman v. KPMG, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Adams v. Raintree Vacation Exchange, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. John Hays v. HCA Holdings, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  4. Kansas City Urology, P.A. v. United Healthcare ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Moran Towing Corp. (In Re Bethlehem Steel Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API