Scalf v. D. B. Log Homes, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J.
In D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1 [112 Cal.Rptr. 786, 520 P.2d 10] (D’Amico), the California Supreme Court noted that admissions of a party obtained through discovery receive an unusual deference in summary judgment proceedings, and, absent a credible explanation, prevail over that party’s later inconsistent declarations. {Id. at p. 22.) However, later cases have cautioned that D’Amico should not be read “as saying that admissions should be shielded from careful examination in light of the entire record.” (Price v. Wells Fargo Bank (1989) 213…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Price v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- King v. United Parcel Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Gilbert v. SykesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Archdale v. American International Specialty Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Minish v. Hanuman FellowshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.