Legal Opinion
Bair v. Peck
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 8, 1990No. 87-1177-CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Judge.
The case comes before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and the defendants Great Bend Internists’, P.A. and Alderson, Schuckman & Smith’s, P.A. motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c), or in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 56. Plaintiff brings this medical malpractice action asserting the court has subject matter jurisdiction on the basis of diversity of citizenship as set forth at 28 U.S.C. § 1332. If, as…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Solomon Lew v. Stanton Moss and Harlean MossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hamilton v. Accu-TekDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Cressler v. NeuenschwanderDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- McEachron v. GlansDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- Stucky ex rel. Stucky v. BatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- National Inspection & Repairs, Inc. v. George S. May International Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.