Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard Louis Durham
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 6, 1991No. 89-30349PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-appellant Richard Durham appeals his conviction for possession of methamphetamine with the intent to distribute it and for using or carrying a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking offense. Durham argues that reversal is required because the government failed to comply with the Jencks Act. The district court imposed a sentence in excess of the applicable guidelines range for the drug trafficking offense. Durham appeals his sentence on the ground that the departure was unwarranted and unreasonable. We affirm the conviction, vacate the sentence, and remand for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Jose Jesus Lira-BarrazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Michael S. Polizzi, United States of America v. Joseph E. MatrangaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. John Michael HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Wayne L. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Jimmie L. WardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- United States v. Johnaton Sampson GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Collazo-AponteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- United States v. James Clifton CherryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Arthur David LemasterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.