Legal Opinion
United States v. Arthur David Lemaster
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 7, 1995No. 94-5097PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DE MASCIO, D.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which KENNEDY, J. joined. JONES, J. (pp. 1233-34), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
DE MASCIO, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a jury conviction and sentence on count III of an indictment charging Arthur David LeMaster with knowingly and willfully making false statements to an FBI agent investigating allegations of corruption in the Kentucky General Assembly in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. The jury found LeMaster not guilty of committing extortion under color of official right in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. BramblettSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. John D. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Elias Gaitan-Acevedo (95-1616) Paul Free (95-1694) Leonarda Oropeza Arechiga (95-1758) Charles Crehore (95-1764)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. WebberCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. John DemjanjukCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Lawrence Ray CarmichaelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.