Legal Opinion

Bethel v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 28, 1924PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

The defendant, Justin Bethel, was tried below on an indictment charging him with the crime of seduction, alleged to have been committed by having carnal knowledge of Edna Sliger, an unmarried female, by virtue of a false and feigned express promise of marriage.

It appears from the testimony adduced at the trial that defendant and Edna Sliger, the girl alleged to have been seduced, were each about seventeen years of age- — ■ slightly under that age — at the time the alleged promise of marriage and act of sexual intercourse occurred, and that the girl was a few months older than the defendant.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Polk v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
  2. Oakes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  4. Davie v. PadgettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  5. Bird v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Klimas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  5. United States v. Louie Gim Hall and Wong Suey LoonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API