Legal Opinion

United States v. Louie Gim Hall and Wong Suey Loon

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 27, 1957No. 24195_1PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEDINA, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Louie and Wong, the two appellants, were charged with wilfully giving $150 to Dorris E. Yarbrough, an investigator of the Immigration and Naturalization Service of the United States Department of Justice, “with the intent to influence his decision and action on a matter at that time pending before him in his official capacity,” and the jury found them guilty as charged, but with a recommendation for leniency. Each defendant was given a suspended sentence of two years imprisonment and they were placed on probation on condition that they cooperate with all…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Lovely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  3. United States v. BirdsallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Shores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  5. State v. TuneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. Cecil Dwayne Evans, Arnold Gene Tate, and Charles Edward Gent, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. Cyrus T. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  4. P.K. Vichare v. Ambac Inc. And Ambac Indemnity Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. John Theodore GlickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API