Legal Opinion

Vincent J. Messina v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, a Foreign Corporation

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 6, 1993No. 91-7175 & 92-7066PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion PER CURIAM.

2Per curiam

Vincent Messina .appeals an order of the district court dismissing his bad faith tort claim against Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. Mr. Messina also challenges the district court’s attorney fees award. We find no merit in Mr. Messina’s arguments and, accordingly, affirm the district court’s rulings.

I. Baokground

In November 1985, Mr. Messina was a passenger in a taxi that ran a red light and collided with another car. The car with which the taxi collided was insured by Nationwide. At the time, Mr. Messina did not own a car, and thus did not have any automobile…

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. Kranzush v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Herrig v. HerrigWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by29 opinions

  1. Azar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Allstate Insurance v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Elmore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. STATE EX REL. ALLSTATE INS. v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Athridge v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API