Legal Opinion

McLean v. Sale

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1978No. 7730SC1037PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Plaintiffs verified complaint was properly considered as ant affidavit. Schoolfield v. Collins, 281 N.C. 604, 189 S.E. 2d 208 (1972). Facts asserted by the plaintiff must be accepted as true in considering defendant’s motion. Railway Co. v. Werner Industries, 286 N.C. 89, 209 S.E. 2d 734 (1974). The record must be considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff in passing upon defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Patterson v. Reid, 10 N.C. App. 22, 178 S.E. 2d 1 (1970).

Considering the record in this case with these principles in mind, we hold there are…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jarman v. OffuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Williams v. LeBarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  3. Bailey v. McGillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Patterson Ex Rel. Jones v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Schoolfield v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Riffe v. ArmstrongWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. McLean v. SaleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. McArdle v. Mission Hosp., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. Riffe v. ArmstrongWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Willitzer v. McCloudOhio Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API