Klotz v. Klotz

The bill is one in partition. It alleges that the complainant is seized in fee of an undivided three-quarter interest in the lands described in the bill. The answer, while admitting most of the allegations of the bill, denies that the interest of the complainant is a three-quarter interest in fee-simple as alleged and asserts that complainant's interest is only a life estate in a three-quarter interest in the described premises. The admitted facts are as follows:

Prior to October, 1935, the premises in question were owned by one Paul F. Klotz, husband of the complainant, and his son, Harland…