Legal Opinion
State v. Kreske
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 10, 1944PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The defendant was charged with operating a motor vehicle in Bethany on July 27, 1943, while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, in violation of § 496e of the Cumulative Supplement, 1939. The state produced evidence and rested its case. The defendant offered no evidence. The trial court found him not guilty and the state, with the consent of the trial court, has appealed, assigning error in holding that upon the evidence the defendant was not guilty as charged and in failing to hold him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The question for determination, therefore, is whether upon the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- State v. FrostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- State v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- State v. CotsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. PundySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- State v. BentonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Lengel v. New Haven Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- State v. EnglehartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- State v. FahySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.