Legal Opinion
State v. Fahy
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 26, 1962PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, C. J.
The defendants were tried on separate informations charging wilful injury to public property under General Statutes § 53-45, as amended by No. 437, § 1, of the 1959 Public Acts. The factual and legal issues in the cases are identical, and the cases were tried together to the court without a jury. The court found the defendants guilty as charged and sentenced each of them to sixty days in jail. They have appealed.
The trial court found the following facts: On February 1, 1960, between the hours of 4 and 5 a.m., swastikas were painted with black paint on the steps and on the casing between two…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Sabel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Rose v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. HannaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.