Legal Opinion

Golsen v. Brand

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1874PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheldon

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Brand against Golsen, for contribution. Otto Hartung, and Ida Hartung, his vrife, made their promissory note, bearing date February 1,1873, payable six months after date, with ten per cent interest, to Jacob Keller.

Before the delivery of the note to Keller, Golsen and Brand, at the instance of the maker, Hartung, and on requirement of the payee, wrote their names in blank upon the back of the note, Golsen writing his first; and on the 26th day of July, 1873, Otto Hartung having previously gone into bankruptcy, Brand paid the note to Keller, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Craig v. CraigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
  2. Armitage v. . PulverNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. Breckinridge v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Trossman v. PhilipsbornAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. Nat. Bank of Austin v. First Wis. Nat. Bank, Etc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Waters v. WatersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Harris v. HandmacherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Sledge v. DobbsIllinois Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API