Kyselka v. Northern Assurance Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Grand Traverse; Mayne (Frederick W.), J. Assumpsit by Albert G. Kyselka against the Northern Assurance Company of Michigan for breach of an agency contract. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, C. J.
Plaintiff sued defendant and recovered in the trial court a judgment for $1,328.11 for certain commissions on renewals of life insurance which he had theretofore solicited for defendant while in its employ. The defense made by defendant is that this claim for commissions was disposed of by a former adjudication between the parties, and that the trial *48court was in error in refusing to so instruct the jury. It appears that plaintiff entered into a written contract with defendant on April 6, 1910, whereby he was to become its agent for the purpose of soliciting insurance; that he continued .to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kyselka v. Northern Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arnold v. Masonic Country ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Stevenson v. Brotherhoods Mutual BenefitMichigan Supreme Court · 1947