Legal Opinion
In Re Cox'Estate
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided September 2, 1953No. 5634PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
260 P.2d 909 (1953)
57 N.M. 543
IN RE COX' ESTATE.
CAMPBELL
v.
ARMSTRONG.
No. 5634.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
September 2, 1953.
Jess R. Nelson, Truth or Consequences, for appellant.
Douglass K. FitzHugh, Truth or Consequences, for appellee.
LUJAN, Justice.
The claimant-appellee filed her claim with the administrator of the Estate of John Cox, deceased, alleging therein that the decedent was indebted to her for board and services performed at his instance in accordance to an oral agreement entered into by and between the decedent and herself. The administrator moved to disallow the same for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Krametbauer v. McDonaldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- In Re White's EstateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Arias v. SpringerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Wells v. Gulf Refining Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Campbell v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. La BadieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. SublettNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- Aragon v. BoydNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- The First National Bank of Amarillo, a National Banking Association, as Trustee Under the Will of Daniel C. Trigg, Jr., Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Citty v. CittyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.