Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Hingle

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 18, 1998No. 98-B-0774PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

liPER CURIAM.*

This attorney disciplinary proceeding arises from one count of formal charges filed against respondent, Gilmer P. Hingle of Monroe, Louisiana, by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”). The charges allege respondent violated Rules 1.2(c) (counseling a client to engage in conduct which the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent), 1.2(d) (fading to consult with client on relevant limitations on the lawyer’s conduct), 3.4(b) (falsification of evidence), 8.4(a) (violating Rules of Professional Conduct), 8.4(b) (committing a criminal act), 8.4(c)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. PitardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  2. In re CollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. State v. HingleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. In re HingleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re BankstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  2. In re LaudumieySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  3. In Re Donald R. PRYORSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  4. In re BrunoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  5. In re MithunSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API