Legal Opinion
In re Bruno
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided May 11, 2007No. 2006-B-2791PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
| ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
2Per curiam
This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Joseph M. Bruno, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana.
UNDERLYING FACTS
The underlying facts of this matter are not in dispute, having been stipulated to by the parties. In 1989, respondent was appointed one of eight members of the Plaintiffs’ Legal Committee (PLC) in the federal class action litigation arising out of an explosion at the Shell Oil Company refinery in Norco. During the contentious liti*578gation, respondent was…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BowenDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012
- In Re BrunoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
- In re BrunoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017