Legal Opinion

McLeod v. Department of Motor Vehicles

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 22, 1976No. 3588-1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Appellant Department of Motor Vehicles revoked respondent Robert McLeod’s “privilege to operate a motor vehicle in this state” after a “formal hearing” as provided by Washington’s implied consent statute, RCW 46.20.308 et seq. McLeod appealed to the Superior. Court pursuant to RCW 46.20.308(5) and RCW 46.20.334. The trial judge found that:

[The law enforcement officer] signed his report [of his belief that McLeod had been driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and of McLeod’s refusal to submit to a chemical test of his breath] to the Department of Motor Vehicles in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. Binckley v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  3. State v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION, DEPT.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Moore v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Schoultz v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Helsten v. SchwendimanUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Cheek v. State ex rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API