Legal Opinion

Gillians v. Vivanco-Small

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 26, 2011No. AC 32133PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The plaintiff, Phyllis E. Gillians, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants1 on her claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress arising out of the parties’ employment in the Stamford office of the department of children and families (department). The plaintiff claims that the court incorrectly determined that she failed to allege sufficient extreme or outrageous conduct to sustain her claim. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following factual allegations, from the plaintiffs second substituted complaint…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Appleton v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Brooks v. SweeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. Muniz v. KravisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. Tracy v. New Milford Public SchoolsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Grasso v. Connecticut Hospice, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  2. Lawson v. HilderbrandDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
  3. CASSOTTO v. AeschlimanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. Cesare v. PACT MSO, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
  5. Gillians v. Vivanco-SmallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API