Legal Opinion
First National Mortgage Co. v. Federal Realty Investment Trust
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 9, 2009No. C-03-02013 RMWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW (DAMAGES PHASE)
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
This action was brought by First National Mortgage Company (“First National”) against Federal Realty Investment Trust (“FRIT”) for FRIT’s breach of a 10-year lease of the office building and land located at 350 South Winchester Boulevard in San Jose, California (“the Property”) and for breach of a put option which gave First National the right to require FRIT to purchase the Property during the lease term. The lease, put option and a call option are contained in a document entitled “Final Proposal”…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Mark Scully v. Us Wats, Inc. Kevin O'hare, Individually and in His Capacity as President of Us Wats Aaron Brown, Individually and in His Capacity as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Us Wats Stephen Parker, Individually and in His Capacity as Executive Vice-President of Us WatsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Central Valley General Hospital v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Latham Land I, LLC v. TGI Friday's, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Latham Land I, LLC v. TGI Friday's, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012