O'Loughlin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWSOM, J.
In this case, we hold that an initial request for vocational rehabilitation benefits is timely under Labor Code section 5405.5 1 where it was presented within one year from the date of the last finding of permanent disability, even though more than five years had elapsed since the date of injury. Petitioner Phillip O’Loughlin (hereafter applicant) seeks review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (hereafter Board) which held that applicant’s request for vocational rehabilitation benefits was barred by the five-year time limitations of sections 5410 2 and 5…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Mudd v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Squaw Valley Ski Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Davis v. City of LeawoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- Society of California Pioneers v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Hug v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Vasquez v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.