Hug v. City of Omaha
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
275 Neb. 820
MICHELLE HUG AND HENSTOCK, INC., APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF OMAHA, APPELLEE.
No. S-07-324.
Supreme Court of Nebraska.
Filed May 30, 2008.
K.C. Engdahl and Karisa D. Johnson, of Engdahl Johnson, L.L.C., for appellants.
Thomas O. Mumgaard, Deputy Omaha City Attorney, and Jo A. Cavel for appellee.
HEAVICAN, C.J., WRIGHT, CONNOLLY, GERRARD, STEPHAN, MCCORMACK, and MILLER-LERMAN, JJ.
HEAVICAN, C.J.
INTRODUCTION
Appellants Michelle Hug and Henstock, Inc. (collectively Hug), brought this action in the district court against appellee City of Omaha (City) contending that the City's ordinance prohibiting…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prendergast v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
- Gourley Ex Rel. Gourley v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Haman v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- D-CO, Inc. v. City of La VistaNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- Yant v. City of Grand IslandNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- REO Enters. v. Village of DorchesterNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
- Sack v. CastilloNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- Garey v. NEB. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCESNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.