Legal Opinion

William R. Darey v. Dr. G. Lee Sandritter, Etc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 28, 1965No. 20065_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, regularly convicted of a criminal offense by a California court, was sentenced to a term of confinement. He did not appeal from the judgment of conviction, and it does not appear that his term has expired. Through prison administrative action, apparently pursuant to Cal.Pen.Code § 2684, he was transferred to a state hospital, where he is now held for treatment. In his petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed in the District Court, he alleges that he is illegally detained by the hospital’s superintendent. He insists that a hearing should have been conducted for the determination of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Higgins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  2. Wells, by Gillig v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  3. Estabrook v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  4. Jones v. PescorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  5. People v. TrippellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roland E. Matthews, Jr. v. Kenneth L. HardyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. Haughey v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1969
  3. Roland E. Matthews, Jr. v. Kenneth L. HardyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  4. Roland E. Matthews, Jr. v. Kenneth L. HardyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API