Legal Opinion
Haughey v. Rhay
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided June 4, 1969No. 3228PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS
EAST, District Judge.
This cause and the various motions of the parties now pending have been assigned to the undersigned U. S. Senior District Judge by Chief Judge Charles L. Powell for determination.
The petitioner (Haughey) instituted these in forma pauperis proceedings by the filing of a propria persona (pro per) *492petition under the title and caption above. The allegations and claims of Haughey are set forth as answers to form questions contained in this court’s standard form of a pro per Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for state prisoners, with a pleading entitled “Action…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mark O. Hatfield, Governor of the State of Oregon v. Paul R. BailleauxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Douglas Stiltner v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary at Walla Walla, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Lau Ah Yew v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- William W. Snow v. Clarence T. Gladden, Warden, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bolding v. HolshouserCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Bolding v. HolshouserCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978