Legal Opinion

Travelers' Insurance v. Mayo

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1897PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Will county; the Hon. Dorrance Dibell, Judge, presiding.

1Per curiam

This is an attachment suit brought by appellant, against appellee, in the circuit court of Will county. There was a judgment for appellee in that Court, and appellant removed the case, by appeal, to the Appellate Court for the Second District. The judgment was affirmed, and the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lacey was as follows:

“This was a suit in assumpsit, seeking recovery on a joint and several promissory note given by R. G. Mayo and his wife, the appellee, executed in the State of Florida June 15, 1888, for §5000, with twelve per cent interest after maturity, and due in two years. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Trustees of Schools of Township 23Illinois Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Lawrence v. BeecherIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Skolnik v. PetellaIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Bullen v. MorrisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  3. Lepper v. JacksonMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State Bank of St. Charles v. BurrIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Skolnik v. PetellaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API