Legal Opinion

State Bank of St. Charles v. Burr

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1940No. 25831. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Appellants seek reversal of a deficiency decree entered against them in the circuit court of Kane county in a foreclosure proceeding. They bring the cause directly to this court because, they say, that as to appellant Annette Burr the entry of a deficiency decree against her lacked due process of law, as required by constitutional provisions.

Appellants are the mortgagors in the real estate mortgage foreclosed in this proceeding. A decree was entered 'on October 22, 1936, foreclosing the mortgage and decreeing a sale of the property if the amount found due on the mortgage, after allowing a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Illinois Steel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Attebery v. BlairIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Cotes v. BennettIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Eggleston v. MorrisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. State Bank of St. Charles v. BurrIllinois Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZahnIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Metrobank v. CannatelloAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  3. Reynolds v. WangelinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  4. Standard Bank and Trust Co. v. CallaghanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Metrobank v. CANNATELLOAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API