European Beverage, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, J.
In this case we hold that, in a court trial, absent a waiver or a stipulation to the contrary, a party is entitled to have the same judge try all portions of a bifurcated trial that depend on weighing evidence and issues of credibility, and that if that judge is unavailable to do so, a mistrial must be declared.
Factual and Procedural Summary
Sam Meara (real party in interest) brought this action claiming he owned a one-half interest in European Beverage, Inc., and that various defendants (petitioners) committed intentional torts by diluting his interest in European Beverage…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Guardianship of the Person & Estate of SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Bodine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Medo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- In Re Marriage of ColomboCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Valentine v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- In Re the Marriage of SeylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- James G. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Marriage of Martinez & CamouCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
- People v. North River Insurance Co. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.