Legal Opinion

European Beverage, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1996No. B098022PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, J.

In this case we hold that, in a court trial, absent a waiver or a stipulation to the contrary, a party is entitled to have the same judge try all portions of a bifurcated trial that depend on weighing evidence and issues of credibility, and that if that judge is unavailable to do so, a mistrial must be declared.

Factual and Procedural Summary

Sam Meara (real party in interest) brought this action claiming he owned a one-half interest in European Beverage, Inc., and that various defendants (petitioners) committed intentional torts by diluting his interest in European Beverage…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re Guardianship of the Person & Estate of SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Bodine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Medo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. In Re Marriage of ColomboCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Valentine v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. In Re the Marriage of SeylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  3. James G. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Marriage of Martinez & CamouCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
  5. People v. North River Insurance Co. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API