Marketel International, Inc. v. Priceline. Com
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDMENT TO DECISION GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LEGGE, District Judge.
On December 5, 2000 the court granted partial summary judgment in favor of defendants. The court’s decisions were not set out in a written order, but were stated in open court on the record of the reporter’s transcript.
As a part of those decisions, the court ruled in favor of defendants on the inven-torship claim (Count 5) on the ground that 35 U.S.C. section 256 does not authorize correction of inventorship when the named inventor acted with “deceptive intent” in securing inventor status. The court cited General…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Ethicon, Inc. And Inbae Yoon, M.D. v. United States Surgical Corporation and Young Jae ChoiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Pannu v. Iolab Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marketel International, Inc. v. Priceline.Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002