Legal Opinion

Fairbanks North Star Borough v. Kandik Construction, Inc. & Associates

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1991No. S-2772PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion

OPINION ON REHEARING

BURKE, Justice.

We rendered our decision in the predecessor to this appeal on March 2, 1990. Fairbanks North Star Borough v. Kandik Construction, Inc., 795 P.2d 793 (Alaska 1990). Following the announcement of our decision, Roen Design Associates, one of the appellees, filed a petition for rehearing.1 We now vacate part IV of our earlier opinion. We also remand for a new trial on the question of Roen’s liability for indemnity to its cross-defendant in the case.

I

Roen contracted to prepare plans for the roads of a subdivision for the Fairbanks North Star Borough. Id. at 796.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Allison v. Shell Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Bay Development, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. San Francisco Unified School District v. California Building Maintenance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Medical City Dallas, Ltd. v. Carlisle Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Conam Alaska v. Bell Lavalin, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Bohna v. HUGHES, THORSNESS, GANTZAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Schneider National, Inc. v. Holland Hitch Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API